Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476041›Full record

ArticleGlobal epidemiology2025

On the use of natural language processing to implement the target trial framework using unstructured data from the electronic health record.

Nicole Rafalko, Milena Gianfrancesco, Neal D Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole RafalkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Milena GianfrancescoDivision of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neal D GoldsteinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability and accessibility of electronic health record (EHR) data has made it a rich secondary source to conduct comparative effectiveness studies. To perform such studies, many researchers are turning to the target trial framework (TTF) to emulate the hypothetical randomized clinical trial. The quality of this emulation depends, in part, on the availability and accessibility of data for each component of the TTF. Yet one overarching challenge with using EHR data is that unstructured fields, such as clinical encounter notes, contain copious details on the patient yet require additional steps to extract if needed in the conduct of the study. Natural language processing (NLP) represents a spectrum of methods to assist with automating this extraction, from simpler rule-based methods to machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches that can handle complex language structures. What follows is a discussion on how NLP methods can augment information and data for researchers looking to estimate a treatment effect using EHR data via the TTF to emulate the hypothetical clinical trial. We conclude with recommendations for researchers interested in using NLP methods to obtain data stored in the free text of the EHR as well as considerations regarding the quality and validity of this data for the TTF.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordNatural language processingObservational researchTarget trial framework

Identifiers

PMID40476041
PMCPMC12140070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.