ArticleGlobal epidemiology2025
On the use of natural language processing to implement the target trial framework using unstructured data from the electronic health record.
Article in Global epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An operational target trial emulation framework for causal inference using electronic health record data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Enhancing personalized suicide risk prediction for VA patients by integrating discrete natural language processing models.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Use of a Novel Natural Language Processing Utility to Extract Structured Data From Free-Text Medical Notes.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing availability and accessibility of electronic health record (EHR) data has made it a rich secondary source to conduct comparative effectiveness studies. To perform such studies, many researchers are turning to the target trial framework (TTF) to emulate the hypothetical randomized clinical trial. The quality of this emulation depends, in part, on the availability and accessibility of data for each component of the TTF. Yet one overarching challenge with using EHR data is that unstructured fields, such as clinical encounter notes, contain copious details on the patient yet require additional steps to extract if needed in the conduct of the study. Natural language processing (NLP) represents a spectrum of methods to assist with automating this extraction, from simpler rule-based methods to machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches that can handle complex language structures. What follows is a discussion on how NLP methods can augment information and data for researchers looking to estimate a treatment effect using EHR data via the TTF to emulate the hypothetical clinical trial. We conclude with recommendations for researchers interested in using NLP methods to obtain data stored in the free text of the EHR as well as considerations regarding the quality and validity of this data for the TTF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.