Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476038›Full record

ReviewBulletin of volcanology2025

Volcanic eruptions and the global subsea telecommunications network.

Michael A Clare, Isobel A Yeo, Jacob Nash, James E Hunt, Semisi Panuve, Alasdair Wilkie, Rebecca Williams, Natasha Dowey, Peter Rowley, Jennifer Barclay and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of volcanology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Michael A ClareMarine Geoscience, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.
Isobel A YeoMarine Geoscience, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.
Jacob NashMarine Geoscience, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.
James E HuntMarine Geoscience, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.
Semisi PanuveTonga Cable Ltd, Nuku'alofa, Tonga.
Alasdair WilkieDigicel, Gros Islet, Saint Lucia.
Rebecca WilliamsSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Natasha DoweyDepartment of the Natural and Built Environment, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Peter RowleySchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jennifer BarclaySchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jeremy PhillipsSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jazmin ScarlettEnvironment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Samantha EngwellBritish Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK.
Timothy J HenstockSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sarah SeabrookNew Zealand Institute of Water and Atmospheric Science, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Sally WatsonNew Zealand Institute of Water and Atmospheric Science, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Richard WysoczanskiNew Zealand Institute of Water and Atmospheric Science, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Marta RiboAuckland University of Technology, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Shane CroninUniversity of Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Peter J TallingSchools of Geography and Earth Science, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Michael CassidyBirmingham University, Birmingham, UK.
Sebastian WattBirmingham University, Birmingham, UK.
Richard RobertsonThe University of West Indies Seismic Research Centre, St. Augustine, Saint George, Trinidad and Tobago.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the first transoceanic telegraph cables were laid in the mid-1800s, rapid communication between continents became possible. The advent of fibre-optic submarine cables in the 1990s catalyzed a global digital revolution. Today, a network of > 1.7 million kilometres of fibre-optic cables crosses the oceans, carrying more than 99% of all digital data traffic worldwide and trillions of dollars in financial transactions. These arteries of the global internet underpin many aspects of our daily lives, and are particularly important for remote island communities that rely on submarine cables for telemedicine, e-commerce, and online education. However, these same remote communities are often in seismically and volcanically active regions and can be prone to natural hazards that threaten their critical subsea communication infrastructure. This vulnerability was acutely exposed in January 2022, when the collapse of the eruption plume of Hunga Volcano triggered fast-moving density currents that damaged Tonga's only international submarine cable, cutting off an entire nation from global communications in the midst of a volcanic crisis. Here, we present a new comprehensive analysis of damage to subsea communications cables by volcanic events from around the world, and document their diverse impacts. Examples include (i) severing of the telegraph cable crossing the Sunda Strait by a tsunami triggered by the 1883 Krakatau eruption, Indonesia; (ii) ocean-entering pyroclastic density currents, lahars, and landslides during the 1902 eruptions of Mount Pelée, Martinique, that damaged six telegraph cables; (iii) destruction of a cable landing station on Montserrat by a pyroclastic density current in 1997; (iv) submarine slope failure at Kick 'em Jenny, Grenada, that damaged two fibre-optic cables; (v) complete loss of the telecommunications network due to power outages following the 2000 eruption of Miyake-jima, Japan; and (vi) disruption to subsea cables resulting from the 2021 eruption of La Soufrière, St. Vincent. We find that the causes of damage typically relate to secondary hazards that occur not only at the same time as the eruption climax, but also some time after. There does not appear to be an explosivity intensity threshold for cable-damaging events; however, the extent of damage may be related to the original volcano morphology (e.g. steep slopes), spatial location (e.g. near the coast or partially/totally submerged), the eruption size or explosivity, and/or volcanic depositional processes involved. Based on these diverse case studies, we present lessons learned for enhancing telecommunications resilience, and discuss how subsea cables themselves can be used as sensors to improve understanding and early warning of volcanic hazards, potentially filling a monitoring gap for remote island communities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-025-01832-1.

Indexed as

Marine geohazardsSubmarine cablesTelecommunications infrastructureVolcanic eruptionVolcanic hazards

Identifiers

PMID40476038
PMCPMC12133983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.