Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475984›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Assessment and Risk Analysis of Nitrosamines in Sausages From Northern Iran.

Mohammad Sadegh Allahkhah, Mohammadhosein Movassaghghazani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Sadegh AllahkhahFaculty of Veterinary Medicine Shab. C., Islamic Azad University Shabestar Iran.
Mohammadhosein MovassaghghazaniDepartment of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Shab. C., Islamic Azad University Shabestar Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-4529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the levels of nitrosamines in sausages consumed in northern Iran and the associated health risks for consumers. For this purpose, two types of sausages, chicken and red meat (60 samples each), were randomly collected from meat product supply centers in the cities of Gilan province from December 2022 to March 2023. The levels of nitrosamines were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For risk evaluation, BMDL10 and MOE were used. In chicken sausages, nitrosamine levels ranged from 0.38 μg/kg (NDPA) to 7.77 μg/kg (NMEA). Red meat sausages ranged from 0.69 μg/kg (NDBA) to 9.59 μg/kg (NMEA). According to the results of the statistical analysis, the level of NDBA in the two types of sausage samples did not show a significant difference. However, a significant difference was observed in the mean levels of other nitrosamines between the two types of sausages. Red meat sausages had the highest mean nitrosamine concentration at 30.71 ± 0.87 μg/kg. The MOE values for both sausage types were below 10,000, indicating a health risk for consumers. These findings indicate the need for regulatory intervention to control nitrite levels in sausages in Gilan province.

Indexed as

high‐performance liquid chromatographyIrannitrosaminerisk assessmentsausage

Identifiers

PMID40475984
PMCPMC12138452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.