Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Reduced antimicrobial consumption through enhanced pneumonia management in critically ill patients: outcomes of an antibiotic stewardship program in the intensive care unit.

Asieb Sekandarzad, Annabelle Flügler, Anne Rheinboldt, David Rother, Gesche Först, Siegbert Rieg, Alexander Supady, Achim Lother, Dawid Leander Staudacher, Tobias Wengenmayer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Asieb Sekandarzad *Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Annabelle Flügler *Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Anne RheinboldtInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
David RotherInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Gesche FörstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Siegbert RiegDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander SupadyInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Achim LotherInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dawid Leander StaudacherInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias WengenmayerInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Winfried V KernDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Paul Marc BieverInterdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who are suspected of having pneumonia are frequently treated with broad-spectrum antimicrobials even when the diagnosis remains uncertain. While appropriate antimicrobial therapy offers undeniable benefits, its inappropriate or excessive use can lead to harmful side effects. This study examines the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in the ICU on both diagnostic accuracy and antimicrobial consumption in critically ill patients with pneumonia. Methods: This cohort study compares a prospective cohort with matched controls from a retrospective sample in the ICU of a tertiary hospital. An ASP was implemented focusing on microbiological sampling of bacteria and antimicrobial therapy. Primary endpoint was days of therapy (DOTs). Secondary endpoints were number of respiratory samples (RS), identification of relevant bacteria in RS and diagnostic accuracy of pneumonia. Clinical safety outcome parameters were length of stay, length of invasive mechanical ventilation and ICU mortality until day 28. Results: A total of 200 patients were assigned to the intervention group (IG) and 200 to the control group (CG). The overall DOTs per patient were 12.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.42 to 14.47] in the CG compared to 9.91 (CI 8.97 to 10.82) in the IG ( Conclusion: Implementation of an ASP in the ICU effectively reduces broad-spectrum antimicrobial consumption in critically ill patients with pneumonia without compromising patient safety.

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardshipantimicrobial resistance patternintensive care unit (ICU)intervention bundlemultifaceted approachreduction of antimicrobial consumption

Identifiers

PMID40475964
PMCPMC12139207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.