SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Effects of different dosages/frequency of Xuebijing injection (a Chinese patent) for sepsis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xuebijing alleviates acute hydrogen sulfide-induced pyroptosis in rat spleen via suppression of the caspase-1/NLRP3 pathway.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Targeting Ferroptosis in Sepsis: Therapeutic Potential and Mechanisms of Natural Products and Traditional Chinese Medicine.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing combined with ulinastatin in the treatment of sepsis complicated by acute lung injury: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Clinical Evidence and Mechanistic Plausibility of Chinese Patent Medicines for Sepsis: An Evidence Map.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has been widely recognized in the treatment of sepsis, however, inadequate information regarding XBJ's optimal dosage and frequency suffice. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of various doses and administration frequencies in patients with sepsis using a network meta-analysis (NMA) to offer therapeutic prescription guidance. Methods: We examined eight databases for 1,765 randomized controlled trials published before July 2024, organized the literature using NoteExpress software and extracted data using Microsoft Excel software. The literature's quality was assessed using the risk of bias evaluation approach endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration. The analysis was conducted by NMA inside a frequency-based framework. Results: Forty-three qualifying studies were included in the analysis, including 5,818 participants. Regarding the enhancement of 28-day mortality, 50 Milliliter (ml)-tie in die (tid) exhibited optimal efficacy, 100 ml-tid demonstrated superior efficacy in ameliorating APACHE II scores, 50 ml-bis in die (bid) proved more effective in enhancing the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), while 100 ml-quaque die (qd) significantly improved C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Additional findings are displayed in net league tables, forest plots, and funnel plot. Conclusions: A daily dose of 100 ml of XBJ was associated with improvement in APTT and CRP levels in patients with sepsis, a daily dose of 150 ml may decrease 28-day mortality; while XBJ with a single-day dose of 300 ml is more effective at improving the APACHE II score, higher dosages correlated with improved prognosis in these patients compared to other doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.