Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475920›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Ultrasonography-Guided Pigtail Catheter Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration for the Treatment of Liver Abscesses: A Comparative Study of Outcomes.

Harsha S, Bhaskar Mallaiah, Sreenidhi G M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harsha SGeneral Surgery, Siddaganga Medical College and Research Institute, Tumkur, IND.
Bhaskar MallaiahGeneral Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Sreenidhi G MGeneral Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Liver abscesses remain a significant clinical challenge, particularly in tropical regions, despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasonography-guided pigtail catheter drainage (PCD) and percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) in the management of liver abscesses. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center from October 2021 to March 2023. A total of 94 patients diagnosed with liver abscess were randomly assigned to two groups, with 47 patients each undergoing PCD and PNA. Baseline characteristics, clinical features, laboratory parameters, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes were recorded and analyzed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY). Results Right upper quadrant pain was the most frequent symptom, with a significantly higher occurrence in the PNA group (p = 0.041). The overall success rate was significantly higher in the PCD group (87.2%) compared to the PNA group (63.8%, p = 0.008). In the PNA group, single aspiration was sufficient in 18 patients (38.3%), whereas 29 patients (61.7%) required two or more aspirations. Time to achieve a 50% reduction in abscess cavity size was significantly shorter in the PCD group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in hospital stay, time to clinical improvement, or adverse events.

Indexed as

abscess resolutioncomparative studyliver abscessminimally invasive interventionpercutaneous needle aspirationpigtail catheter drainageultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40475920
PMCPMC12139690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.