ArticleMethodsX2025
Bridging language gaps: The role of NLP and speech recognition in oral english instruction.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Prakriti Assessment: Toward Standardized Evidence-Based Ayurvedic Practice.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Natural Language Processing (NLP) and speech recognition have transformed language learning by providing interactive and real-time feedback, enhancing oral English proficiency. These technologies facilitate personalized and adaptive learning, making pronunciation and fluency improvement more efficient. Traditional methods lack real-time speech assessment and individualized feedback, limiting learners' progress. Existing speech recognition models struggle with diverse accents, variations in speaking styles, and computational efficiency, reducing their effectiveness in real-world applications. This study utilizes three datasets-including a custom dataset of 882 English teachers, the CMU ARCTIC corpus, and LibriSpeech Clean-to ensure generalizability and robustness. The methodology integrates Hidden Markov Models for speech recognition, NLP-based text analysis, and computer vision-based lip movement detection to create an adaptive multimodal learning system. The novelty of this study lies in its real-time Bayesian feedback mechanism and multimodal integration of audio, visual, and textual data, enabling dynamic and personalized oral instruction. Performance is evaluated using recognition accuracy, processing speed, and statistical significance testing. The continuous HMM model achieves up to 97.5 % accuracy and significantly outperforms existing models such as MLP-LSTM and GPT-3.5-turbo (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.