Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475890›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Bridging language gaps: The role of NLP and speech recognition in oral english instruction.

Parul Dubey, Pushkar Dubey, Rohit Raja, Sapna Singh Kshatri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parul DubeySymbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Pushkar DubeyDepartment of Management, Pandit Sundarlal Sharma (Open) University Chhattisgarh, India.
Rohit RajaDepartment of Information Technology, School of Studies (Engineering and Technology), Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University), India.
Sapna Singh KshatriDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Natural Language Processing (NLP) and speech recognition have transformed language learning by providing interactive and real-time feedback, enhancing oral English proficiency. These technologies facilitate personalized and adaptive learning, making pronunciation and fluency improvement more efficient. Traditional methods lack real-time speech assessment and individualized feedback, limiting learners' progress. Existing speech recognition models struggle with diverse accents, variations in speaking styles, and computational efficiency, reducing their effectiveness in real-world applications. This study utilizes three datasets-including a custom dataset of 882 English teachers, the CMU ARCTIC corpus, and LibriSpeech Clean-to ensure generalizability and robustness. The methodology integrates Hidden Markov Models for speech recognition, NLP-based text analysis, and computer vision-based lip movement detection to create an adaptive multimodal learning system. The novelty of this study lies in its real-time Bayesian feedback mechanism and multimodal integration of audio, visual, and textual data, enabling dynamic and personalized oral instruction. Performance is evaluated using recognition accuracy, processing speed, and statistical significance testing. The continuous HMM model achieves up to 97.5 % accuracy and significantly outperforms existing models such as MLP-LSTM and GPT-3.5-turbo (

Indexed as

Deep learningFace multimodal natural language processing (NLP)Hidden markov models (HMMs)Multimodal NLP and Speech RecognitionOral english instructionSpeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID40475890
PMCPMC12139008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.