Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475848›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Enhancing patient-specific deep learning based segmentation for abdominal magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: A framework conditioned on prior segmentation.

Francesca De Benetti, Nikolaos Delopoulos, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Nassir Navab, Thomas Wendler, Shadi Albarqouni, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca De BenettiChair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany.
Nikolaos DelopoulosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Nassir NavabChair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany.
Thomas WendlerChair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany.
Shadi AlbarqouniClinic for Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 53113, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Conventionally, the contours annotated during magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) planning are manually corrected during the RT fractions, which is a time-consuming task. Deep learning-based segmentation can be helpful, but the available patient-specific approaches require training at least one model per patient, which is computationally expensive. In this work, we introduced a novel framework that integrates fraction MR volumes and planning segmentation maps to generate robust fraction MR segmentations without the need for patient-specific retraining. Materials and methods: The dataset included 69 patients (222 fraction MRs in total) treated with MRgRT for abdominal cancers with a 0.35 T MR-Linac, and annotations for eight clinically relevant abdominal structures (aorta, bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal canal and stomach). In the framework, we implemented two alternative models capable of generating patient-specific segmentations using the planning segmentation as prior information. The first one is a 3D UNet with dual-channel input (i.e. fraction MR and planning segmentation map) and the second one is a modified 3D UNet with double encoder for the same two inputs. Results: On average, the two models with prior anatomical information outperformed the conventional population-based 3D UNet with an increase in Dice similarity coefficient Conclusion: The proposed workflow was able to generate accurate patient-specific segmentations while avoiding training one model per patient and allowing for a seamless integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

MRIMR-linacPatient-specific segmentationRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40475848
PMCPMC12138391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.