ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Enhancing patient-specific deep learning based segmentation for abdominal magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: A framework conditioned on prior segmentation.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-fraction prior learning for scalable organ-at-risk segmentation in abdominal MR-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Conditional organs-of-interest segmentation with plausible inter-fraction variation simulation for pancreatic magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in limited-data settings.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Use of Patient-Specific 3D Models in Paediatric Surgery: Effect on Communication and Surgical Management.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of deep learning-based segmentation and registration using pre-treatment contours for online rectal delineation in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Patient-specific deep learning tracking for real-time 2D pancreas localisation in kV-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Conventionally, the contours annotated during magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) planning are manually corrected during the RT fractions, which is a time-consuming task. Deep learning-based segmentation can be helpful, but the available patient-specific approaches require training at least one model per patient, which is computationally expensive. In this work, we introduced a novel framework that integrates fraction MR volumes and planning segmentation maps to generate robust fraction MR segmentations without the need for patient-specific retraining. Materials and methods: The dataset included 69 patients (222 fraction MRs in total) treated with MRgRT for abdominal cancers with a 0.35 T MR-Linac, and annotations for eight clinically relevant abdominal structures (aorta, bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal canal and stomach). In the framework, we implemented two alternative models capable of generating patient-specific segmentations using the planning segmentation as prior information. The first one is a 3D UNet with dual-channel input (i.e. fraction MR and planning segmentation map) and the second one is a modified 3D UNet with double encoder for the same two inputs. Results: On average, the two models with prior anatomical information outperformed the conventional population-based 3D UNet with an increase in Dice similarity coefficient Conclusion: The proposed workflow was able to generate accurate patient-specific segmentations while avoiding training one model per patient and allowing for a seamless integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.