Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475839›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2025

Real-time gated proton therapy: Introducing clinical workflow and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).

Wei Yang Calvin Koh, Hong Qi Tan, Kah Seng Lew, Wan Ting Alice Kor, Nur Atiqah Binte Samsuri, Jason Wei Siang Chan, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua, James Kuan Huei Lee, Andrew Wibawa, Zubin Master and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wei Yang Calvin KohDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Hong Qi TanDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Kah Seng LewDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Wan Ting Alice KorDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Nur Atiqah Binte SamsuriDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jason Wei Siang ChanDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Clifford Ghee Ann ChuaDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
James Kuan Huei LeeDepartment of Physics, National University Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew WibawaDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Zubin MasterDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Sung Yong ParkDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) has been used in proton therapy to mitigate respiratory motion challenges. This study presents the first comprehensive description of the RGPT clinical workflow at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) and introduces a novel Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for RGPT. Methods: We detail the workflow for prostate and liver/lung proton treatments. The FMEA, following AAPM TG-100 guidelines, evaluated potential failure modes based on occurrence, detectability, and severity. This comprehensive risk assessment approach allows for the establishment of robust Quality Assurance (QA) protocols, enhancing treatment safety and efficacy. The FMEA was performed by two disciplinary groups, namely the medical physicists and radiation therapists. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is used as the metric to assess the consistency of ratings among participants. Results: Since implementation, 15 patients (13 prostate, 2 liver) have been treated with RGPT. The study identified 96 potential failure modes, with 47 evaluated by two disciplines. Inter-rater concordance analysis revealed strong agreement within one group, while combined groups showed lower consistency, highlighting potential differences in risk perception between disciplines. Notably, severity ratings demonstrated better correlations among raters compared to other categories, suggesting a shared understanding of the potential impact of failures. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights for institutions implementing RGPT, potentially enhancing treatment workflow, patient safety, and QA procedures. The detailed workflow description and FMEA results offer a foundation for standardizing RGPT practices and prioritizing risk mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborations to further refine RGPT protocols and risk assessments.

Identifiers

PMID40475839
PMCPMC12138576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.