ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
A Case of Melanoma-Associated Retinopathy Presenting with Ocular Symptoms as the Initial Manifestation: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Paraneoplastic melanoma-associated retinopathy mimicking posterior uveitis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a distinct subset within the spectrum of retinal-dysfunction disorders. It is triggered by the cross-reaction between circulating antibodies originating from malignant melanoma (MM) and retinal antigens. The timely identification of paraneoplastic retinal diseases is crucial, as it can significantly contribute to the early diagnosis and treatment of underlying malignancies. Currently, increasing awareness of the early clinical manifestations of MAR is essential for clinicians to detect primary or metastatic MMs at an earlier stage. Case Presentation: This report details a case of a patient who initially presented with night blindness and visual field defects as the primary symptoms. Through a comprehensive and systematic examination process, which involved detailed ophthalmological examinations and multidisciplinary diagnostic approaches, esophageal, and cardia MM was ultimately diagnosed. The patient was referred to an external hospital for comprehensive antitumor management, and posttreatment, the patient self-reported a notable improvement compared to the pretreatment state. Conclusion: The purpose of sharing this case is to clarify the early clinical manifestations of MAR. It is anticipated that this will prompt clinicians to enhance their vigilance and identify primary or metastatic MMs earlier. Early treatment of the primary disease not only has the potential to reduce the risk of irreversible immune-mediated damage to retinal cells but also to improve visual outcomes. This highlights the significance of early diagnosis and intervention in the management of such diseases, providing important reference for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.