ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Cardiac Indices Parameters on the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor as Potential Indicators to Predict the Ultrafiltration Endpoint Success in Acute Heart Failure Treatment.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06533124 (Parameters of Cardiac Indices on the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor As Potential Indicators for Predicting the Achievement of Ultrafiltration Endpoint for Acute Heart Failure Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Parameters of Cardiac Indices on the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor As Potential Indicators for Predicting the Achievement of Ultrafiltration Endpoint for Acute Heart Failure Treatment
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrafiltration (UF) is an alternative approach to diuretic therapy for the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF), but its optimal endpoint is unclear. This study explores using non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) to determine UF endpoints based on hemodynamic changes. Methods: In this single-anonymized, randomized controlled trial, acute decompensated heart failure patients were randomly assigned to UF (U, n = 20) and USCOM+UF (UU, n = 20) groups at a ratio of 1:1. A mixed linear model was utilized to analyze repeated measurement data of hemodynamic indicators (primary endpoint) in the U and UU groups. A 30% or 50% decrease in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations relative to the baseline was established as the criteria for the UF endpoint success. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify potential indicators within the USCOM that could have influenced the UF endpoint success. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the value of the predictive model. Economic benefits, including treatment costs and hospitalization duration, were also assessed. Results: Change rates in mean arterial pressure, heart rate (HR), urine output, hematocrit, and BNP concentrations were similar between the U and UU groups over 7 days (all Conclusions: Observing the USCOM using probability formulas served to determine appropriate UF endpoints during AHF treatments. UF combined with the USCOM can reduce the costs of UF and hospitalization. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06533124, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06533124?term=NCT06533124&rank=1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.