SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Efficiency in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Age-Dependent Inflammatory, Lipid, and Echocardiographic Phenotypes in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Associations with In-Hospital Adverse Clinical Events.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Platelet to lymphocyte ratio in the healthy population of Vojvodina.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a prediction model for in-stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation during dual antiplatelet therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is applied as a potential first-line prognostic predictor for many cardiovascular diseases due to its simplicity and accessibility. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the predictive power of PLR for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), explore its predictive efficacy in different populations, and identify other potential influencing factors. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for eligible studies until February 7, 2025, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was employed for quality assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were combined using Stata 15.1 and Meta-DiSc software. Meta-regression analyses, subgroup analyses, threshold effect analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias tests were performed. Results: Nine studies (7174 patients) were enrolled. High PLR could predict MACEs in ACS patients undergoing PCI, with 0.68 sensitivity (95% CI, 0.60-0.76), 0.65 specificity (95% CI, 0.57-0.73), and 0.72 AUC (95% CI, 0.68-0.76). Subgroup analyses noted that PLR better predicted MACEs after PCI in ACS patients in the subgroup with a higher proportion of female patients and the subset aged >60 years. Meta-regression analyses unveiled that study type ( Conclusions: High PLR levels have favorable values in predicting in-hospital and long-term MACEs after PCI in ACS patients. The PLR had greater sensitivity and an improved ability to identify risk in patients aged >60 years and the subgroup with a higher proportion of women and was also more sensitive to in-hospital MACEs. The PROSPERO Registration: No. CRD42024537586, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024537586.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.