Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475737›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Freedom of Atrial Fibrillation Predictions After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Review of Current Evidence.

Ibrahim Antoun, Ahmed Abdelrazik, Mahmoud Eldesouky, Ahmed I Kotb, Zakkariya Vali, Abdulmalik Koya, Edward Y M Lau, Ivelin Koev, Riyaz Somani, G André Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ibrahim AntounDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-7476
Ahmed AbdelrazikDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Mahmoud EldesoukyDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Ahmed I KotbDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Zakkariya ValiDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Abdulmalik KoyaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Edward Y M LauDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Ivelin KoevDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
Riyaz SomaniDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
G André NgDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, poses significant challenges due to high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone treatment that disrupts arrhythmogenic pathways through electrically isolating pulmonary veins. However, recurrence rates remain substantial, driven by complex demographic, biochemical, imaging, and electrocardiographic factors reflecting underlying pathophysiologies. Advancements in PVI techniques, including pulsed-field ablation and electroanatomic mapping, have improved procedural success. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) enhance outcomes by stabilising atrial activity and reducing early recurrence, although the long-term benefits of these drugs are debated. Nonetheless, integrating these predictors into patient selection, procedural strategies, and post-ablation management enables personalised interventions. This review uniquely integrates demographic, biochemical, imaging, electrocardiographic, and procedural predictors into a multidimensional framework for comprehensive risk stratification of PVI outcomes. We critically evaluate emerging procedural techniques, notably pulsed-field ablation (PFA), emphasising the clinical applicability of these procedures. Key biochemical markers (e.g., N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) and imaging findings (e.g., left atrial fibrosis, epicardial fat) reflecting atrial pathophysiology are discussed in detail. Furthermore, readily accessible electrocardiographic parameters such as prolonged P wave duration and dispersion are emphasised as practical tools for patient risk assessment. This multidimensional approach holds promise for reducing AF recurrence and improving long-term outcomes in PVI, advancing patient-centered care in AF management.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationdirect current cardioversionelectrocardiogramoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID40475737
PMCPMC12135664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.