ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Freedom of Atrial Fibrillation Predictions After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, poses significant challenges due to high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone treatment that disrupts arrhythmogenic pathways through electrically isolating pulmonary veins. However, recurrence rates remain substantial, driven by complex demographic, biochemical, imaging, and electrocardiographic factors reflecting underlying pathophysiologies. Advancements in PVI techniques, including pulsed-field ablation and electroanatomic mapping, have improved procedural success. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) enhance outcomes by stabilising atrial activity and reducing early recurrence, although the long-term benefits of these drugs are debated. Nonetheless, integrating these predictors into patient selection, procedural strategies, and post-ablation management enables personalised interventions. This review uniquely integrates demographic, biochemical, imaging, electrocardiographic, and procedural predictors into a multidimensional framework for comprehensive risk stratification of PVI outcomes. We critically evaluate emerging procedural techniques, notably pulsed-field ablation (PFA), emphasising the clinical applicability of these procedures. Key biochemical markers (e.g., N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) and imaging findings (e.g., left atrial fibrosis, epicardial fat) reflecting atrial pathophysiology are discussed in detail. Furthermore, readily accessible electrocardiographic parameters such as prolonged P wave duration and dispersion are emphasised as practical tools for patient risk assessment. This multidimensional approach holds promise for reducing AF recurrence and improving long-term outcomes in PVI, advancing patient-centered care in AF management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.