ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety study of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI under multiple antithrombotic therapies.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Association of preoperative systemic inflammation with postoperative conduction block in TAVI patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly utilized for patients with pure aortic regurgitation (PAR). A significant clinical challenge in this patient population is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which occurs frequently post-TAVI and can impact cardiac conduction and rhythm management. This study aimed to explore the effects of PPI on short-term mortality, rates of adverse events, and cardiac function in PAR patients following TAVI. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted in a single center, included 69 PAR patients who underwent TAVI from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received a permanent pacemaker (PM) and those who did not (NPM). The outcomes measured included complications such as pacemaker pocket hematoma and infection, changes in postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at 6 months, as well as rates of rehospitalization and mortality. Results: No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics or complications between the PM and NPM groups ( Conclusions: This study was the first to investigate the effects of PPI on the short-term mortality, adverse events, and cardiac function of PAR after TAVI. The results indicated that for PAR, advanced age and previous cerebral embolism increase the mortality after TAVI; however, PPI was not associated with mortality and adverse events after 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.