ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
The control of overt and covert attention across two nodes of the attention-control network.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention is a central cognitive capability whose focus is thought to be directed by a spatial map coding behavioral priority. Here we tested the three defining properties of priority map theory with electrophysiological recordings from two attentional control areas. Both areas, lateral intraparietal area LIP and dorsal posterior inferotemporal cortex PITd, selected behaviorally relevant locations even in the absence of visual stimuli (cognitive sustainment principle). Second, priority signals are thought to arise from the summation of multiple spatial signals (superposition principle). LIP approximated linear summation for visual stimuli, spatial attention, and eye movements, while PITd did not. Third, the same priority signal should guide different behaviors (agnosticity principle). LIP, instead, used separable processing channels for representing attentional focus and eye position, while PITd coded attentional focus only. Thus primate attentional control circuits implement multiple priority maps, whose functional diversity and dimensionality increase the computational capacity of attentional selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.