ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
SVCROWS: A User-Defined Tool for Interpreting Significant Structural Variants in Heterogeneous Datasets.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) are abundant across all life, and have major impacts on the genome and transcriptome. However, it is difficult to appreciate the individual significance of SVs when they are heterogeneously distributed across a genomic neighborhood. Further, low-input sequencing technologies or sequencing of many individuals across a population introduce variance that complicates SV counting and association studies. Tools exist to simplify SV datasets, but these SV mergers begin to fail on large or highly variable datasets. To address this issue, we introduce a new SV merger called SVCROWS (Structural Variation Consensus with Reciprocal Overlap and Weighted Sizes). This option-rich R package merges and summarizes SV regions using a size-weighted reciprocal overlap framework, effectively accounting for skewed impacts of variable-length SVs. User input directs stringency of comparisons across a range of sizes, enabling different levels of resolution in complex genome regions that harbor both small and large SVs. When compared to other SV merging programs, SVCROWS accurately merges SVs while maintaining less frequent genotypes of the unmerged SV calls. SVCROWS proves to be especially useful with large and highly variable single-cell datasets for enabling SV discovery. Overall, the novel size-weighted comparisons of SVCROWS presents a framework for improved interpretation of SV calls, and its ease of use allows it to be applied to virtually any upstream analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.