Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475595›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

SVCROWS: A User-Defined Tool for Interpreting Significant Structural Variants in Heterogeneous Datasets.

Noah Brown, Charles Danis, Vazira Ahmedjanova, Jennifer L Guler

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah BrownDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA 22903.ORCID 0009-0002-1284-0720
Charles DanisDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Vazira AhmedjanovaDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Jennifer L GulerDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA 22903.ORCID 0000-0001-6301-4563

Funding

The evolution of copy number variations in the AT-rich Plasmodium genomeR01AI150856 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GULER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) are abundant across all life, and have major impacts on the genome and transcriptome. However, it is difficult to appreciate the individual significance of SVs when they are heterogeneously distributed across a genomic neighborhood. Further, low-input sequencing technologies or sequencing of many individuals across a population introduce variance that complicates SV counting and association studies. Tools exist to simplify SV datasets, but these SV mergers begin to fail on large or highly variable datasets. To address this issue, we introduce a new SV merger called SVCROWS (Structural Variation Consensus with Reciprocal Overlap and Weighted Sizes). This option-rich R package merges and summarizes SV regions using a size-weighted reciprocal overlap framework, effectively accounting for skewed impacts of variable-length SVs. User input directs stringency of comparisons across a range of sizes, enabling different levels of resolution in complex genome regions that harbor both small and large SVs. When compared to other SV merging programs, SVCROWS accurately merges SVs while maintaining less frequent genotypes of the unmerged SV calls. SVCROWS proves to be especially useful with large and highly variable single-cell datasets for enabling SV discovery. Overall, the novel size-weighted comparisons of SVCROWS presents a framework for improved interpretation of SV calls, and its ease of use allows it to be applied to virtually any upstream analyses.

Identifiers

PMID40475595
PMCPMC12140265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.