ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Network-based Near-Scalp Personalized Brain Stimulation Targets.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Functional connectivity (FC) is often used to identify personalized targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, existing methods often overlook individual differences in whole-cortex network organization. Furthermore, in some personalized TMS protocols, a lower stimulation intensity is used for targets closer to the scalp. Therefore, near-scalp targets might improve patient tolerance. Objective: We develop an algorithm to simultaneously optimize FC and scalp proximity for personalized target localization. Methods: We use the multi-session hierarchical Bayesian model (MS-HBM) to estimate high-quality individual-specific cortical networks. A tree-based algorithm is then used to select the optimal target location. By essentially having no parameter to tune, our framework might improve generalizability across populations. We compare our approach to existing "cluster" and "cone" algorithms in terms of scalp proximity, test-retest reliability, and FC to brain regions implicated in depression. Results: In two test-retest datasets of healthy individuals from the United States and Singapore, tree-based MS-HBM reliably identifies personalized TMS targets for depression in close proximity to the scalp. These targets compare favorably with cone and cluster targets in terms of reliability, scalp proximity, and FC to the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in new out-of-sample MRI sessions from the same individuals. Compared with the cluster algorithm, tree-based MS-HBM targets hypothetically reduce stimulation intensity by 12% using a linear intensity adjustment protocol. To demonstrate versatility, we apply the same algorithm, without having to tune any parameter, to identify personalized TMS targets for anxiety. Conclusion: The tree-based MS-HBM algorithm provides a robust, generalizable framework to estimate near-scalp personalized targets across different populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.