ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our ability to extract meaning from linguistic inputs and package ideas into word sequences is supported by a network of left-hemisphere frontal and temporal brain areas. Despite extensive research, previous attempts to discover differences among these language areas have not revealed clear dissociations or spatial organization. All areas respond similarly during controlled linguistic experiments as well as during naturalistic language comprehension. To search for finer-grained organizational principles of language processing, we applied data-driven decomposition methods to ultra-high-field (7T) fMRI responses from eight participants listening to 200 linguistically diverse sentences. Using a cross-validation procedure that identifies shared structure across individuals, we find that two components successfully generalize across participants, together accounting for about 32% of the explainable variance in brain responses to sentences. The first component corresponds to processing difficulty, and the second-to meaning abstractness; we formally support this interpretation through targeted behavioral experiments and information-theoretic measures. Furthermore, we find that the two components are systematically organized within frontal and temporal language areas, with the meaning-abstractness component more prominent in the temporal regions. These findings reveal an interpretable, low-dimensional, spatially structured representational basis for language processing, and advance our understanding of linguistic representations at a detailed, fine-scale organizational level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.