Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475366›Full record

ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025

EVALUATION OF TENDON HEALING AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF ISOLATED SUPRASPINATUS TEARS.

Guilherme José Costa Ferreira, Marlos Augusto Bitencourt Costa, Rubens Carneiro Dos Santos, Marcos Rassi Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guilherme José Costa FerreiraUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina, Goias, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2087-4295
Marlos Augusto Bitencourt CostaHospital Ortopédico de Goiânia, Goiania, Goias, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3300-952X
Rubens Carneiro Dos SantosHospital Ortopédico de Goiânia, Goiania, Goias, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3411-6877
Marcos Rassi FernandesUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Goias, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-528X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the healing of supraspinatus tendon lesions after arthroscopic repair, with analysis of intra- and inter-observer agreement by two experienced evaluators for the same lesions. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted with patients evaluated in the postoperative period of arthroscopic surgery to repair isolated supraspinatus tendon ruptures, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Tendon healing was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging by two independent evaluators at two time points, with a seven-day interval between them. Categorical data were presented in absolute and relative frequencies, and mixed linear regression models were used to analyze intra- and inter-observer agreement, with a probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of 5%. Results: Twenty-three patients (26 shoulders) were evaluated, with a mean age of 61.5 years. At both evaluation times, most patients presented a healing grade between I and III in the Sugaya classification for both observers. The interobserver agreement was good, and the intraobserver agreement was excellent. Conclusion: The mean tendon healing rate for arthroscopic repair of isolated supraspinatus ruptures was 81.7%. Intra-observer agreement ratings were considered excellent, while inter-observer agreement was good, demonstrating reliability in the evaluations performed.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulderTendonsWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID40475366
PMCPMC12136619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.