ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
Cortical evoked responses to evaluate the effect of spinal cord stimulation on the pain pathways.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alpha Oscillations and Conditioned Pain Modulation Is Associated With Treatment Resistance to Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are insufficiently understood. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) measures how a painful stimulus is affected by a second painful stimulus. We investigated whether cortical evoked response can be used to evaluate CPM in a patient treated with burst, tonic and sham SCS. Methods: A 40-year-old patient underwent 3 magnetoencephalography sessions (burst, tonic, sham SCS) with 1-week intervals. Painful electrical stimuli were applied to the tibial nerve before, during and after CPM (conditioning: icepack on forearm). Evoked responses were analysed in the primary somatosensory and anterior cingulate cortices. Results: Before CPM, the highest evoked response amplitude occurred under sham SCS, followed by tonic SCS. During CPM pain ratings remained unchanged. However, CPM reduced evoked response amplitudes in the primary somatosensory cortex under tonic and sham SCS and in the anterior cingulate cortex under all SCS paradigms. Conclusions: CPM reduced evoked response amplitudes, while pain ratings were unaffected, suggesting neurophysiological measures provide additional insights into CPM effects. Tonic and burst SCS both appeared to reduce cortical capacity to attend to stimuli, with burst showing the greatest effect. Significance: Cortical responses offer a valuable tool to assess pain pathways. Larger scale studies are needed to enhance our understanding of SCS mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.