Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475288›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025

Evidence of non-response bias in patient reported outcome measurement information system surveys.

Andrew R Stephens, Nicholas R Bender, Ramzi El-Hassan, Rajeev K Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond one-time PROMs: high-frequency single-item mobile ePROM tracking of postoperative recovery in spine surgery-a prospective feasibility study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew R StephensUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States of America.
Nicholas R BenderUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States of America.
Ramzi El-HassanUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States of America.
Rajeev K PatelUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measurement instrument surveys (PROMIS) have been increasingly used to assess clinical outcomes following a variety of medical procedures. Despite their value in evaluating patient functional status, response rates to these surveys remain low. Understanding differences in demographics between responders and non-responders to PROMIS may be beneficial to improving generalizability and response rates. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics between patients who respond to PROMIS surveys and those who do not, hypothesizing no significant differences between these groups. Methods: Adult new patient visits from 2018 to 2022 in Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation outpatient clinics at a single academic medical center were analyzed. Patients completed PROMIS surveys (physical function, pain interference, and depression) on iPads at each clinic visit. Demographic variables such as gender, race, BMI, smoking status, employment status, marital status, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess for variables associated with an increased likelihood of responding to PROMIS surveys. Results: A total of 29,830 patients were included in this study. Of the total patient cohort, 8331 (27.9 %) responded to the PROMIS surveys. Significant demographic differences were found between responders and non-responders. Patients in the least deprived ADI quartile were more likely to respond compared to those in the most deprived quartile (33.5 % vs 23.7 %, p < 0.001). Employed patients, white patients, non-smokers and married individuals were more likely to respond. On multivariate analysis, unemployment (OR 0.71, p = 0.006), increased BMI (OR 0.93, p = 0.014), and higher ADI (OR 0.94, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with lower response rates. Conclusions: PROMIS response rates are influenced by patient demographics, with lower response rates observed in unemployed, non-white, and socioeconomically deprived populations. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to increase response rates and ensure equitable data collection in PROMIS surveys to enhancing the generalizability of clinical decisions made using PROMIS data.

Indexed as

Area Deprivation IndexNon-response biasPROMISResponse rate

Identifiers

PMID40475288
PMCPMC12139396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.