SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A rapid review of periviable (22 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks) counselling practices and the need for a trauma-informed care approach.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on periviable birth from the parents of surviving infants.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Ethical challenges and moral conflicts in periviability prenatal counseling: a scoping review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the risks of mortality and morbidity for infants born in the periviable period, a decision is made between parents and professionals prior to the birth as to whether survival-focused or comfort care is most appropriate at delivery. Medical information should be shared with parents and parental perspectives and priorities in relation to this information should be explored and integrated into the decision-making process. Conducting these conversations is complex and nuanced. This rapid review conducted a systematic search of the available literature relating to the approaches to and content of the pre-birth periviable conversation and identified three core themes: Transparency, Collaboration and Empowerment. In brief, these themes demonstrate that the information provided to parents should consistently outline all available care options relevant to their baby, including compassionately delivered, but honest and descriptive accounts of emotive options, such as comfort care. Information should be individualised to the specific circumstances and risk factors of that individual family. Perinatal professionals should seek to incorporate discussion of topics key to the 'good parent belief' to empower parents within their role. Avoiding or omitting discussion of uncertainty and dismissal of hope within these conversations was associated with parental distrust and impaired communication. The themes identified within this rapid review align with the principles of trauma-informed care and provide a structure for further research and service development focused on improving the quality and experience of pre-birth periviable conversations for future parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.