Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475205›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Green spaces, blue spaces and human health: an updated umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses.

XiaoWen Wang, Bowen Feng, Juan Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Urban greenspace and dementia: Measures, mechanisms, and methodological guidance.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Nature prescription for patients with chronic respiratory diseases.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

XiaoWen Wang *College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Bowen Feng *Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Juan WangCollege of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Green spaces have been recognized for their ecological services, including air purification and biodiversity protection, which contribute to the enhancement of life quality and well-being. However, despite the surge in research evaluating the impact of blue-green spaces on health outcomes, we still lack a definitive understanding of how green and blue spaces affect human health outcomes. To assess the impact of blue-green spaces on human health outcomes, we systematically summarized and evaluated the relationship between green and blue spaces and human health through an umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses up to the year 2024. Methods: The study follows the PRISMA guidelines and includes meta analyses from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on evidence and methodological improvements. Inclusion criteria encompass studies on human populations, exposure to green and blue spaces, and health outcomes such as mortality, disease risk, and physiological indicators. Data extraction and quality assessment of evidence and methods are conducted using the GRADE system and AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: We find that green space exposure is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, mortality from cardiovascular diseases, incidence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome, low birth weight, and mental health improvements. Blue spaces also show positive associations with beneficial health outcomes, including reduced obesity rates and improved psychological well-being. However, the evidence regarding green space exposure and specific health outcomes such as cancer, asthma, and allergic rhinitis remains heterogeneous and unclear. Discussion: Green and blue spaces clearly have some impact on health. For some outcomes, the effects are robust. This article emphasizes the importance of improving residents' health through urban planning in public health strategies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier [CRD42024533346].

Indexed as

Health StatusParks, RecreationalHumansMeta-Analysis as Topicblue spacesgreen spaceshuman healthhuman settlementsumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40475205
PMCPMC12137254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.