ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Socioeconomic status and its limited influence on perceptions of heated tobacco products and cigarettes: no relation with physical health, but association with mental health benefits and lower sensitivity to peer pressure.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Socioeconomic status is related with individuals' attitudes toward health behaviors and perceptions of risk. This study investigated the relationships between socioeconomic status and perceptions of the impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs) and cigarette smoking on the physical, mental, and social well-being of users. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population-based random sample of 2,500 HTP users and former smokers over the age of 25. The computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) method was employed to gather data. Information on gender, age, education, place of residence, income, and detailed perceptions of the impact of HTPs use and cigarette smoking on physical, mental, and social well-being was collected. A socioeconomic status score was derived based on education and income data. Multivariable multinomial regression analysis was used to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on perceptions of HTPs use and cigarette smoking in relation to physical, mental, and social well-being, controlling for age, place of residence, and perceived health status. The reference category was middle socioeconomic status and the middle category of perceived impact. Results: A total of 2,254 participants were included in the analysis. Socioeconomic status was not related with perceptions of the impact of HTPs use or cigarette smoking on physical well-being. Compared to those with middle socioeconomic status, individuals with low socioeconomic status were more likely to perceive a positive impact of HTPs use on mental well-being (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.12-2.60). Women with low socioeconomic status showed a stronger perception of being unaffected by peer pressure, both against smoking cigarettes and using HTPs (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.11-2.57; OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.10-2.12, respectively). Conclusion: While socioeconomic status did not differentiate perceptions of the impact of HTPs use or smoking on physical health, more tailored public health strategies that consider socioeconomic factors may be needed when addressing mental health perceptions and the influence of peer pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.