Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475164›Full record

ArticleImmuno-oncology technology2025

A phase II study of nivolumab, ipilimumab, and radiation in combination with influenza vaccine in patients with pancreatic cancer (INFLUENCE).

I M Chen, S Theile, K Madsen, J S Johansen, T Lorentzen, A Toxværd, E Høgdall, I M Svane, D Nielsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05116917 (Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Radiation in Combination With Influenza Vaccine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05116917 phase2terminatednot on this map

Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Radiation in Combination With Influenza Vaccine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer (INFLUENCE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHerlev HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled19ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab, Influenza vaccine, SBRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

I M ChenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
S TheileDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
K MadsenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
J S JohansenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
T LorentzenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Unit of Surgical Ultrasound, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
A ToxværdDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
E HøgdallDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
I M SvaneDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
D NielsenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Considering strong T-cell response from influenza vaccination, we aimed to evaluate ipilimumab, nivolumab, seasonal influenza vaccine, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with refractory pancreatic cancer (PC). Materials and methods: In a single-center, phase II study (NCT05116917), individuals diagnosed with PC with progressive disease (PD) after gemcitabine- or fluorouracil-containing regimens were enrolled. SBRT (15 Gy) was administered on day 1 of the first cycle. Ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) was administered every 6 weeks and was limited to a maximum of two infusions. Nivolumab (3 mg/kg) was administered every 2 weeks until either PD or unacceptable toxicity, or for a maximum duration of 1 year. The influenza vaccine was administered subcutaneously on the first day of the first cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate with a predefined threshold of 15%. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and safety. Results: Between 15 November 2021 and 23 May 2023, 19 patients were enrolled and treated. As of data cut-off on 11 November 2023, the median follow-up time was 2.2 months (interquartile range 1.7-4.4 months). No objective responses or stable disease was observed. The median PFS was 1.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-1.8 months], and the median OS was 2.2 months (95% CI 1.8-4.6 months). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 13 patients (68%), with 3 (16%) experiencing grade 3 or higher events. Conclusion: Combined ipilimumab, nivolumab, influenza vaccine, and SBRT in patients with PC was feasible but did not lead to objective responses, and thus did not satisfy the predefined criteria for expanding to complete accrual.

Indexed as

INFLUENCEinfluenza vaccineipilimumabnivolumabpancreatic cancerstereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40475164
PMCPMC12140036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.