Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475144›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Benchmarking methods integrating GWAS and single-cell transcriptomic data for mapping trait-cell type associations.

Ang Li, Tian Lin, Alicia Walker, Xiao Tan, Ruolan Zhao, Shuyang Yao, Patrick F Sullivan, Jens Hjerling-Leffler, Naomi R Wray, Jian Zeng

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ang LiInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1186-3448
Tian LinInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Alicia WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Xiao TanInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ruolan ZhaoInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shuyang YaoDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick F SullivanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens Hjerling-LefflerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-1776
Naomi R WrayInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jian ZengInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-5220

Funding

1/7 PGC: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124871 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULIK, CYNTHIA M, SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered numerous trait-associated variants, but their biological context remains unclear. Integrating GWAS summary statistics with single-cell RNA-sequencing expression profiles can help identify the cell types in which these variants influence traits. Two main strategies have been developed to integrate these data types. The "single cell to GWAS" strategy (representing most methods) identifies gene sets with cell-type-specific expression and then follows with enrichment analyses applied to GWAS summary statistics. Conversely, the "GWAS to single cell" strategy begins with a list of trait-associated genes and calculates a cumulative disease score per cell based on gene expression count data. We systematically evaluated 19 approaches verses "ground truth" trait-cell type pairs to assess their statistical power and false positive rates. Based on these analyses, we draw seven key conclusions to guide future studies. We also propose a Cauchy approach to combine the two main strategies to maximize power for detecting trait-cell type associations.

Identifiers

PMID40475144
PMCPMC12140538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.