ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Benchmarking methods integrating GWAS and single-cell transcriptomic data for mapping trait-cell type associations.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered numerous trait-associated variants, but their biological context remains unclear. Integrating GWAS summary statistics with single-cell RNA-sequencing expression profiles can help identify the cell types in which these variants influence traits. Two main strategies have been developed to integrate these data types. The "single cell to GWAS" strategy (representing most methods) identifies gene sets with cell-type-specific expression and then follows with enrichment analyses applied to GWAS summary statistics. Conversely, the "GWAS to single cell" strategy begins with a list of trait-associated genes and calculates a cumulative disease score per cell based on gene expression count data. We systematically evaluated 19 approaches verses "ground truth" trait-cell type pairs to assess their statistical power and false positive rates. Based on these analyses, we draw seven key conclusions to guide future studies. We also propose a Cauchy approach to combine the two main strategies to maximize power for detecting trait-cell type associations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.