ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Unexpected movement and improvement of residual subretinal fluid after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report an unusual case of subretinal fluid (SRF) movement from the inferior region to the fovea following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery in a high myopic patient, despite the closure of the causative retinal tear. Observation: A 38-year-old woman with high myopia and no medical history underwent a scleral buckling procedure for RRD in her right eye. Postoperatively, while the retinal hole was closed, SRF progressively moved from the inferior region towards the fovea. A second surgery (pars plana vitrectomy) was performed due to suspected micro-holes, but none were identified. Despite the absence of micro-holes, SRF continued to shift from the inferior region towards the fovea, eventually leading to foveal detachment over several months. Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography revealed no abnormalities. Over time, the SRF spontaneously resolved, and the patient retained stable visual acuity of 20/20 with no recurrence. Conclusion and importance: This case highlights an unusual pattern of SRF movement following RRD surgery, initially raising concerns about re-detachment but ultimately resolving spontaneously. The SRF localized within a high-myopia-associated staphyloma, suggesting a possible positional influence. The movement of SRF towards the fovea is generally considered an alarming sign of re-detachment. However, this case suggests that, in some instances, it may represent a natural absorption process rather than disease recurrence. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying SRF movement in highly myopic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.