Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475100›Full record

ArticleSkin appendage disorders2025

Clinical Trials in Nail Psoriasis: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Current State of Research.

Amit Singal, Nina Vijayvargiya, Naeha Pathak, Shari R Lipner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amit SingalRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Nina VijayvargiyaWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Naeha PathakIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Shari R LipnerDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nail involvement occurs in approximately 90% of patients with cutaneous psoriasis and in isolation in 5%-10% of patients. There is an unmet need for diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for nail psoriasis (NP), partially due to limited number of clinical trials. Methods: The ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU, the Australian New Zealand, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registries were queried for the term "nail psoriasis". Trial data characteristics were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 112 clinical trials were included, with mean trial length 46.7 weeks and mean number of participants 272.7. Medications were most often studied in 97 (86.6%) trials, followed by lasers in 7 (6.3%) trials. NP Severity Index score was the most often studied outcome measure in 91 (84.3%) trials, and only 56 (52.8%) trials assessed adverse events. Only 3 (2.83%) trials included children, and many clinical trials excluded patients aged 65+ and 85+. Results were posted for 46 (41.4%) trials with mean participant age 45.1 years, mean percentage of females of 38.3%, and 87.8% of participants being White. Conclusion: Our findings highlight a need for clinical trials assessing efficacy and long-term therapeutic safety with a broad range of age-groups and increased representation of minorities and female patients.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsNail psoriasisOutcome measuresPsoriasisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40475100
PMCPMC12136555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.