ArticleSkin appendage disorders2025
Gender Differences in Adverse Effects and Dosing Practices of Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil for Androgenetic Alopecia: A Retrospective Analysis of 310 Patients.
Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- No Association between Patient Demographics and Adverse Effects of Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil in a Retrospective Cohort study of Nonscarring Alopecia Patients.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- Oral Minoxidil for Alopecia Treatment: Risks, Benefits, and Recommendations.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Off-label low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) is used for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatment, with limited safety data. We investigated LDOM adverse effects (AEs) in AGA patients. Methods: AGA patients taking LDOM were identified (January 1, 2010-December 3, 2022). AEs and management were recorded from follow-up and emergency room visits. Fisher's exact test, logistic regression, and Benjamini-Hochberg procedure assessed significance and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: Three hundred ten AGA patients were analyzed with mean age 47.5 years and 53.2% females. The average LDOM dose was lower for females vs. males. AEs were observed in 14.9% of patients, with dizziness/lightheadedness, hypertrichosis, and extremity edema being most common. Higher doses were associated with increased likelihood of dizziness/lightheadedness. Females had higher overall incidence of AEs; however, gender differences did not persist after subgroup analysis. Among patients experiencing AEs, 11.1% adjusted their dosage and 28.9% discontinued treatment. Conclusion: A higher LDOM dose increased risk of dizziness/lightheadedness in both genders, with females more likely to experience any AE. Patients are often started at inappropriately high doses, causing AE-induced regimen changes. Therefore, we recommend a cautious approach when prescribing LDOM, starting with lower doses and gradually increasing as tolerated, and counseling female patients regarding their higher risk of AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.