ArticleBioactive materials2025
Radiation cross-linked collagen scaffolds facilitate root coverage and keratinized gingival regeneration.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A standardized rat model of maxillary anterior periodontal soft tissue defect for the evaluation of soft tissue graft materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- An injectable hyaluronic acid-silanol hydrogel containing arginine and puerarin for immune modulation and enhanced diabetic wound healing.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to develop a radiation cross-linked collagen scaffold (RCS) and assess its potential for root coverage and keratinized gingival regeneration, addressing the prevalent issue of gingival recession and limitations of traditional treatments. RCS was prepared through electron beam irradiation and cross-linking followed by freeze-drying. Its properties were evaluated, including Fourier transform infrared analysis, swelling behavior, microscopic observation, porosity measurement, compression modulus and structural stability. In a rat gingival recession model with 96 rats divided into four groups, the root coverage index and gingival health indices were measured, and histological analyses were conducted. The cross-linked network structure of RCS provided excellent mechanical properties and stability. In the rat model, RCS effectively promoted gingival regeneration, with the RCS group achieving a root coverage index of 87.7 ± 2.7 %, which was 54.13 %, 42.83 % and 8.41 % higher than that of the sham operation group, non-crosslinked group and chemical crosslinked group respectively. Histological analysis showed that RCS promoted anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization, enhanced collagen deposition and gingival lamina propria fiber density and increased angiogenesis. Additionally, RCS exhibited good biosafety, as blood indices and organ coefficients remained normal. In conclusion, RCS effectively promotes gingival regeneration and is a promising keratinized gingiva substitute for gingival recession, offering a new option for oral tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.