ArticleAJPM focus2025
An Electronic Health Record-Based Platform for Social Needs Assessment and Navigation Services: Preliminary Results of an RCT.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05574699 (Piloting a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Identify and Refer Patients With Social Needs to Community-based Organizations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Piloting a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Identify and Refer Patients With Social Needs to Community-based Organizations
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The study team has developed an electronic health record-integrated platform, including a clinical decision support and closed-loop referral tool, to identify patients with social needs and to provide assessment and navigation services. This paper presents the results of the first 6 months of the study assessing the effectiveness of this platform. Study design: This was an RCT. Setting: This study took place in 5 primary care clinics at the Johns Hopkins Health System and 5 community-based organizations participating in the digital closed-loop referral system. Participants: This study included African-American adult (aged ≥18 years) patients living in socioeconomically challenged neighborhoods in Baltimore City. Intervention: The study compared the electronic health record-integrated digital platform with the standard of care. Main outcome measures: The main outcome was a change in the number of identified social needs from enrollment to 3-month follow-up, comparing intervention with control groups. Results: During the first ∼6 months of the study, the authors reached out to 1,648 eligible patients, 92 (5.59%) of whom enrolled and consented to join the trial. Among the intervention group, using only information provided by the electronic health record-based digital platform, the authors identified 25 patients (56.82%) whom they deemed not to require further social needs assessment (Intervention Group A) and 19 patients (43.18%) in whom the information provided in the digital platform suggested that high social need may be present (Intervention Group B). This latter group was deemed to require further in-depth social needs assessment and subsequent social services navigation support, potentially including referral to the participating community-based organizations. More patients in Intervention Group B than in the control group and Intervention Group A experienced a decrease in social needs documented by providers across the Johns Hopkins Health System outside the study setting (8 patients [42.11%], 11 [22.92%], and 2 [8.00%]; Conclusions: These preliminary findings show that structuring a social needs assessment and intervention within clinical electronic health records can improve the social needs assessment and intervention process. Trial registration: This trial is registered through the NIH on clnicaltrials.gov (NCT05574699).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.