ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Feasibility of elective neck irradiation in treating node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has replaced conventional two-dimensional radiation therapy as the mainstream radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, side effects continue to be a significant concern during the radiotherapy process for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The recognized target area for cervical prophylaxis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is whole neck irradiation (WNI), Currently, some studies have confirmed that upper neck irradiation (UNI) may be feasible as a preventive measure for NPC patients with negative neck lymph nodes. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively investigate and compare the efficacy of selective UNI and WNI in improving survival outcomes and regional control in patients with lymph node-negative NPC. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to October 27, 2023, using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text keywords related to "nasopharyngeal carcinoma," "lymph node negative," and "neck irradiation." The titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles were reviewed. Results: Our meta-analysis of 11 studies revealed no significant differences in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), or lymph node recurrence between the UNI and WNI groups for patients with cervical lymph node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These findings suggest that UNI is a safe and feasible treatment option for this patient population. Conclusion: UNI is a safe and feasible option for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with negative cervical lymph nodes or only retropharyngeal lymph node (RLN) metastases. UNI may reduce the radiation dose to normal tissues, potentially decreasing long-term adverse effects and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.