Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475001›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Excess adiposity and cancer: evaluating a preclinical-clinical obesity framework for risk stratification.

Michael F Leitzmann, Michael J Stein, Hansjörg Baurecht, Heinz Freisling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Obesity, sleep apnea and cancer revisited.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Betulinic acid and obesity-related disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael F LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael J SteinDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hansjörg BaurechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Heinz FreislingNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a known cancer risk factor, yet its classification by body mass index fails to capture organ dysfunction. Methods: In 459,342 UK Biobank participants enrolled between 2006 and 2010, we applied the Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission's definitions of preclinical (excess adiposity without organ dysfunction) and clinical obesity (with organ dysfunction) to prospectively assess associations with 28 cancers. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each obesity classification and cancer type. Findings: During 11.6 years of follow-up, 47,060 incident cancer cases were identified. Preclinical obesity was positively associated with 11 cancer types across multiple organ systems, including cancers of the digestive (esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric cardia, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, colorectum), reproductive (endometrium, postmenopausal breast, fatal prostate), urinary (kidney), and endocrine (thyroid) systems. Clinical obesity was positively associated with 12 cancers, showing stronger relations particularly for metabolically driven malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma and endometrial, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. It was also positively associated with lung cancer. Conversely, preclinical and clinical obesity were inversely associated with non-fatal prostate cancer, suggesting a distinct underlying mechanism. We estimate that in the UK Biobank cohort, preclinical obesity accounted for 5.5% (4.7, 6.3) and clinical obesity for 4.3% (3.6, 4.9) of obesity-related cancer. Interpretation: The link between preclinical obesity and increased cancer risk suggests that obesity-related carcinogenesis begins before clinically detectable abnormalities, highlighting the need for early risk identification. Stronger associations with clinical obesity, particularly in metabolically driven cancers, reinforce the role of organ dysfunction in exacerbating carcinogenesis, emphasizing medical monitoring and intervention. Funding: Funding for IIG_FULL_2021_027 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. This study was supported by the French National Cancer Institute (l'Institut National du Cancer, INCA_16824) and the German Research Foundation (BA 5459/2-1).

Indexed as

Cancer riskClinical obesityCohort study

Identifiers

PMID40475001
PMCPMC12140032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.