ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Excess adiposity and cancer: evaluating a preclinical-clinical obesity framework for risk stratification.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent Obesity Classification Between the Edmonton Obesity Staging System and the Lancet Commission Model.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Obesity, sleep apnea and cancer revisited.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Review
- Senescent obesity signature in breast cancer: a paradigm of reverse cardio-oncology.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Targeting the activin/myostatin - actrii pathway to preserve skeletal muscle mass in obesity: mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Weight management in obese cancer patients during curative active treatment: protocol for the CANOBESE feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Fueling or Fighting Cancer? The Thermogenic Paradox of Brown Adipose Tissue.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Obesity and melanoma: unraveling the paradoxical survival benefit in immunotherapy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Preclinical and clinical obesity: prevalence, associations to cardiometabolic risk and response to lifestyle intervention in NHANES and the EPIC-Potsdam and TULIP studies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Incretin Mimetics in Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Review
- Insulin resistance-related indices, genetic risk, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in individuals with preclinical or clinical obesity: a large prospective cohort study in the UK biobank.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Correspondence regarding "excess adiposity and cancer: evaluating a preclinical-clinical obesity framework for risk stratification".EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Contributions of Clinical Obesity and Preclinical Obesity to the All-Cause Mortality Risk: Findings From the UK Biobank Cohort.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Article
- Dynamic phenotypes of preclinical and clinical obesity in relation to new-onset cancer risk: A longitudinal analysis from the UK biobank.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Betulinic acid and obesity-related disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota signatures across BMI categories in adults and combined diagnostic value with clinical indicators for early obesity risk stratification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a known cancer risk factor, yet its classification by body mass index fails to capture organ dysfunction. Methods: In 459,342 UK Biobank participants enrolled between 2006 and 2010, we applied the Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission's definitions of preclinical (excess adiposity without organ dysfunction) and clinical obesity (with organ dysfunction) to prospectively assess associations with 28 cancers. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each obesity classification and cancer type. Findings: During 11.6 years of follow-up, 47,060 incident cancer cases were identified. Preclinical obesity was positively associated with 11 cancer types across multiple organ systems, including cancers of the digestive (esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric cardia, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, colorectum), reproductive (endometrium, postmenopausal breast, fatal prostate), urinary (kidney), and endocrine (thyroid) systems. Clinical obesity was positively associated with 12 cancers, showing stronger relations particularly for metabolically driven malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma and endometrial, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. It was also positively associated with lung cancer. Conversely, preclinical and clinical obesity were inversely associated with non-fatal prostate cancer, suggesting a distinct underlying mechanism. We estimate that in the UK Biobank cohort, preclinical obesity accounted for 5.5% (4.7, 6.3) and clinical obesity for 4.3% (3.6, 4.9) of obesity-related cancer. Interpretation: The link between preclinical obesity and increased cancer risk suggests that obesity-related carcinogenesis begins before clinically detectable abnormalities, highlighting the need for early risk identification. Stronger associations with clinical obesity, particularly in metabolically driven cancers, reinforce the role of organ dysfunction in exacerbating carcinogenesis, emphasizing medical monitoring and intervention. Funding: Funding for IIG_FULL_2021_027 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. This study was supported by the French National Cancer Institute (l'Institut National du Cancer, INCA_16824) and the German Research Foundation (BA 5459/2-1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.