ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Radiomics in differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omic profiles of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: an integrated landscape.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Reducing Complications in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Machine Learning-Based Radiomics for Differentiating Pancreatic Lesions: A Potential Tool to Enhance Clinical Decision-Making and Nursing Management.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether radiomics could predict histotype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). Contrast-enhanced CT scans of 193 patients were retrospectively reviewed, encompassing 97 PDACs and 96 PNETs. Additionally, anamnestic data and laboratory data were evaluated. A total of 107 features were extracted for both the arterial and venous phases. ROC curves were constructed for the parameters with the highest AUC, considering two groups: one including all lesions and the other including only lesions smaller than 5 cm. The following feature differences were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Without considering lesion size: for the arterial phase, 16 first-order and 38 s-order features; for the venous phase, 10 first-order and 20 s-order features. When considering lesion size: for the arterial phase, 16 first-order and 52 s-order features; for the venous phase, 11 first-order and 36 s-order features. The radiomics features with the highest AUC values included ART_firstorder_RootMeanSquared (AUC = 0.896, p < 0.01) in the arterial phase and VEN_firstorder_Median (AUC = 0.737, p < 0.05) in the venous phase for all lesions, and ART_firstorder_RootMeanSquared (AUC = 0.859, p < 0.01) and VEN_firstorder_Median (AUC = 0.713, p < 0.05) for lesions smaller than 5 cm. Texture analysis of pancreatic pathology has shown good predictability in defining the PNET histotype. This analysis potentially offering a non-invasive, imaging-based method to accurately differentiate between pancreatic tumor types. Such advancements could lead to more precise and personalized treatment planning, ultimately optimizing the use of medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.