Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474924›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Engagement of Plastic Surgery Content on TikTok and Instagram.

Ishan S Patel, Anjali Om, Dev Dwivedi, Amulya Addepalli, Daniel Cuzzone, Gabriela Garcia Nores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ishan S PatelFrom the Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Anjali OmDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Dev DwivediRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Amulya AddepalliRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Daniel CuzzoneDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Gabriela Garcia NoresDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media is a powerful tool for plastic surgeons to connect with patients and to post both educational content and advertisements for their practices. TikTok is a platform that has gained popularity in the last 5 years, particularly for plastic surgeons. Although several studies have assessed engagement with plastic surgery content on other platforms, no studies have analyzed engagement on TikTok and compared engagement levels to those of Instagram. Methods: This study identified and evaluated the posts of the top 10 most popular plastic surgeons on TikTok and Instagram using the search term "#plasticsurgery." The number of likes, views, and comments, and the surgical procedure covered in their 25 most recent posts was noted at 2 separate time points. Posts were categorized into the following categories: before-and-after, celebrity, private life, comedy, advertisement, or education. Engagement was calculated by totaling the number of views, likes, and comments. Results: A total of 1000 posts across both TikTok and Instagram were analyzed, 293 of which discussed specific procedures. TikTok had significantly higher total average engagement (438,261 per post) than Instagram (275,565 per post) ( Conclusions: These data suggest that TikTok may have surpassed Instagram in user engagement with plastic surgery posts. However, Instagram may have higher engagement for posts in specific content categories. Plastic surgeons may use these data to maximize engagement by identifying the best platform for posts of different content.

Identifiers

PMID40474924
PMCPMC12140714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.