ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Assessment of the diagnostic efficacy of five non-invasive tests for MASLD: external validation utilizing data from two cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Environmental Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Pooled it
- From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Strategies: A Comprehensive Overview of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Liver fibrosis risk: a silent threat in type 1 diabetes mellitus.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Review
- Liver steatosis, selected organokines, and cardiovascular risk markers in rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- From fatty liver indices to the Zhejiang University index: Re-shaping risk stratification of metabolic liver disease in diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Analysis of the Association Between TG/HDL, TyG, TyG-BMI, and ZJU Indices with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Nano-Enhanced Diets: Advancing Metabolic Dysfunction-Related Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) - A Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- Association between lipid accumulation product and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with normal weight: a population-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Numerous non-invasive tests (NITs) have been developed for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) over the past few decades. However, their applicability to metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), as redefined and renamed by the recent Delphi Consensus Statement, necessitates further investigation. Consequently, this study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of five clinically utilized NITs (FLI/FSI/ZJU/LAP/HSI) in assessing the risk of MASLD. Methods: The participants for this study were sourced from the Health Management Center at the Hospital of Chengdu Office of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, as well as from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020.3 cycle. The diagnostic efficacy of NITs was thoroughly evaluated and compared via methods such as the area under the curve (AUC), subgroup AUC, and clinical utility. Results: This study incorporated a total of 2,187 participants from the Health Management Center cohort and 5,524 participants from the NHANES cohort. In both cohorts, the FLI, FSI, LAP, ZJU, and HSI performed well in identifying those at high risk for MASLD. This effectiveness was consistently observed across various subgroups, including those defined by age, sex, race, overweight, hypertension, and diabetes status. Specifically, within the NHANES cohort, the FSI and FLI emerged as superior predictors of MASLD risk, with AUC values of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.826-0.847) and 0.835 (95% CI: 0.825-0.845), respectively. The difference in the AUC between these two NITs was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: Overall, the FLI, FSI, ZJU, LAP, and HSI continue to demonstrate significant diagnostic value, even when they are applied to the newly designated MASLD and are suitable for screening in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.