Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474879›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Patient-Reported Experiences of Home-Based Breathing Exercises After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Cohort Study.

Elisabeth Westerdahl, Charlotte Urell, Henrik Johansson, Barbara Cristina Brocki, Marcus Jonsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth WesterdahlUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-1662
Charlotte UrellDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Physiotherapy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-0781
Henrik JohanssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Physiotherapy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-5098
Barbara Cristina BrockiDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-6507
Marcus JonssonDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-8562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed patient-reported experiences and perceived respiratory outcomes of home-based deep breathing exercises 3 months after cardiac surgery. A postal questionnaire was sent to 120 patients at a Swedish university hospital, with 92 respondents (77%). The majority (89%) performed breathing exercises after discharge, with 77% reporting them as very easy to perform. Most patients continued the exercises for 2 to 4 weeks (41%) or 1 to 2 months (20%), typically practicing 3 times per day. The exercises were well tolerated, with 87% experiencing no discomfort. Motivation was generally high-43% felt very motivated, and 78% found the exercises useful. While chest pain was reported as low and 56% experienced improved breathing, nearly half of the respondents reported difficulties with coughing, and 10% sought medical care for respiratory infections. Overall, home-based deep breathing exercises were perceived as beneficial and well accepted. However, engagement and adherence varied, highlighting the need for tailored support to encourage sustained participation.

Indexed as

breathing exercisesphysical therapypostoperativerehabilitationthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40474879
PMCPMC12138212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.