ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Plant Responses to a Re-emergence of Cultural Burning in Long-Unburnt, Threatened Temperate Woodlands.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant Responses to a Re-emergence of Cultural Burning in Long-Unburnt, Threatened Temperate Woodlands.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For tens of thousands of years, Indigenous Peoples have shaped the structure and function of ecosystems through cultural burning, which has many important cultural, ecological, and societal values. In recent years, public interest in cultural burning has increased in response to more severe wildfires globally, and alongside greater calls from Indigenous Peoples for cultural revitalization, as well as generations of Indigenous leadership in advancing community self-determination. This has sparked the development of many new agency-supported cultural burning programs worldwide. However, these programs are often limited by an absence of cross-cultural partnerships and a lack of understanding of how contemporary ecosystems respond to burning. Here, we report the ecological outcomes of an Indigenous-led cultural burning program, delivered by a cross-cultural partnership between Aboriginal communities, ecologists, land managers, and emergency responders. Our ecological study was underpinned by data collected against a before, after, control, impact design in the critically endangered box-gum grassy woodlands of eastern Australia. We provide evidence that cultural burning promoted the establishment of disturbance-sensitive native leguminous plants and graminoids, with positive responses pronounced in high-condition sites. However, exotic plants characterized burning responses where floristic condition was initially low. Our findings demonstrate the marked influence of starting conditions on vegetation responses after burning, which are likely a product of past disturbance. Taken together, the results highlight the potential complexities of reintroducing fire into long-unburnt landscapes that have been highly modified by a long history of western agricultural management. Therefore, post-burning interventions in low-floristic condition sites will be critical to mitigate weed invasion and to promote native plants. Our work demonstrates the value of forming partnerships that unite Indigenous knowledge and western science and management to generate cross-cultural positive outcomes and benefits. These include the generation of a new body of ecological evidence to support the reemergence of cultural burning in southeastern Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.