ReviewJournal of anatomy2025
The secret in their eyes: A review of the recessus orbitalis, a unique structure of flatfishes.
Review in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The secret in their eyes: A review of the recessus orbitalis, a unique structure of flatfishes.Journal of anatomy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes) are famous for having one of the most peculiar anatomical transformations in the animal kingdom, the ontogenetic migration of one eye from one side of the head to the other. But the eyes of flatfishes also carry a much lesser known but equally unique modification: an organ called the recessus orbitalis, which is responsible for projecting the eyeball above the level of the head, thus expanding their fields of vision. However, the morphology and distribution of the organ have never been thoroughly investigated. Previous studies reported only part of the recessus orbitalis and mistakenly suggested that it opened into the orbital cavity. We show that the organ forms a fully enclosed system consisting of two interconnected chambers: the facial chamber, which corresponds to the organ previously reported in the literature, and the scleral chamber, which encases the inner portions of the eyeball and is more challenging to detect through manual dissection. The organ is filled with interstitial fluid, and the walls of both chambers-especially the facial one-contain smooth, not skeletal and muscle fibers. These findings combined with field observations allowed us to propose a new functional model for the recessus orbitalis. The organ seems to operate as a dual-pump system, dynamically shifting interstitial fluid between the facial and scleral chambers. Inflation of the facial chamber results in eye retraction, whereas inflation of the scleral chamber causes eye protrusion. The presence of smooth muscle fibers, which can sustain contractions with minimal energy expenditure, supports this inferred mechanism, allowing the eye to remain fully protruded or retracted for extended periods. The recessus orbitalis has never been confirmed in several flatfish families, and the organ was recently considered absent in Psettodidae, the sister group to all other flatfishes. However, we positively identified this organ in all 74 species examined representing all 16 currently recognized flatfish families, including Psettodidae. This indicates that the presence of the recessus orbitalis is an evolutionary novelty (synapomorphy) for the entire Pleuronectiformes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.