ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025
Household economic impact of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in five countries in Southern and Eastern Africa.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis is the second leading cause of AIDS-related mortality. Cryptococcal meningitis is a poverty-related disease and the majority of cases occur in settings where resources are limited and access to quality care is often linked to an individual's ability to pay for services. We have previously demonstrated the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of a single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin-based treatment regimen within the AMBITION-cm trial. Here, we present a five-country, within-trial analysis exploring the household economic impact of cryptococcal meningitis.
methodsEight hundred and ten participants were recruited into this sub-study in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe between January 2018 and February 2021. We collected data on annual household expenditure, direct costs and indirect costs incurred prior to enrolment and during the 10-week trial period. Costs were inflated and converted to 2022 USD. We calculated out-of-pocket expenditure, lost income and catastrophic healthcare expenditure, defined as costs exceeding 20% of annual household expenditure.
resultsThe average total out-of-pocket expenditure plus lost income prior to enrolment was $132 and 17.9% (145/810, 95% CI 15.3-20.5) of participant households had already experienced catastrophic healthcare expenditure. Among the 592 surviving participants, when combining out-of-pocket expenditure and lost income, the average cost was $516 and 29.1% of annual household expenditure across all countries, ranging from $230 (7.6%) in South Africa to $592 (64.2%) in Zimbabwe. More than half (296/581, 51.0%, 95% CI 46.9-55.0) of households experienced catastrophic healthcare expenditure by the end of the trial, ranging from 16.0% (13/81, 95% CI 7.9-24.2) in South Africa to 68.1% (156/229, 95% CI 62.0-74.2) in Uganda.
conclusionsThis is the first study exploring the household economic impact experienced by those diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis. The household economic impact of cryptococcal meningitis is high and more than half of households of individuals who survive experience catastrophic healthcare expenditure. It is likely these figures are higher outside of the research setting. This highlights the profound financial impact of this devastating infection and provides a rationale to offer financial and social protection to those affected. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72509687.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.