ArticleHealth services research2025
Veteran Mental Health Emergency Care Utilization Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05394025 (COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory - Long-Term Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory - Long-Term Outcomes (LTO) Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Veteran Mental Health Emergency Care Utilization Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether Veterans infected with SARS-CoV-2 have an elevated risk for needing mental health emergency care (MHEC) relative to uninfected comparators, as measured by emergency department or urgent care clinic utilization for a mental health diagnosis. DATA SOURCES/EXTRACTION: Data from Veterans Health Administration (VHA), VHA-paid, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid-paid services were used to identify incident MHEC use within 1 year of infection for Veterans with a SARS-CoV-2 infection and matched comparators. STUDY
designThis was a national, retrospective cohort study that leveraged a target trial emulation framework to examine long-term outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Veterans enrolled in VHA care. Uninfected comparators were matched based on month of infection, demographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics. We calculated cumulative incidence rates per 10,000 persons and utilized Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for MHEC up to one year post-infection. PRINCIPAL
findingsThe cohort included 207,968 Veterans with SARS-CoV-2 and 1,036,944 comparators. The 365-day incidence of MHEC use was greater among SARS-CoV-2 patients than comparators (HR = 1.48; 95% CI: [1.44, 1.52]). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 had a higher hazard for MHEC use than comparators in all timeframes analyzed.
conclusionsSARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased MHEC use. Active care coordination with existing mental health treatment providers may help mitigate post-infection mental health distress. Future research should explore specific contextual factors contributing to MHEC, such as gaps in continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.