Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474340›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Measuring natural selection on the transcriptome.

John R Stinchcombe, John K Kelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John R StinchcombeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S3B2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2964
John K KellyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-1252

Funding

Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 2421689Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences 1940785Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The level and pattern of gene expression is increasingly recognized as a principal determinant of plant phenotypes and thus of fitness. The estimation of natural selection on the transcriptome is an emerging research discipline. We here review recent progress and consider the challenges posed by the high dimensionality of the transcriptome for the multiple regression methods routinely used to characterize selection in field experiments. We consider several different methods, including classical multivariate statistical approaches, regularized regression, latent factor models, and machine learning, that address the fact that the number of traits potentially affecting fitness (each expressed gene) can greatly exceed the number of plants that researchers can reasonably monitor in a field study. While such studies are currently few, extant data are sufficient to illustrate several of these approaches. With additional methodological development coupled with applications to a broader range of species, we believe prospects are favorable for directly characterizing selection on gene expression within natural plant populations.

Indexed as

PlantsSelection, GeneticTranscriptomeMachine Learningcoexpression networkseQTLfitnessnatural selectionRNA‐seqtranscriptomes

Identifiers

PMID40474340
PMCPMC12329170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.