Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474316›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Infant Parent Support (IPS): a multidisciplinary intervention to improve the mental health of children with a social worker - a study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.

Jaycee Pownall, Karen Crawford, Lindsay Dalgarno, Judith Fisher, Sharon Graham, Fiona Turner, Helen Minnis, Kathleen Boyd, Abril Seyahian, Alex McConnachie and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06003582 (Partnership for Change - Co-production and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Children With a Social Worker), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06003582 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Partnership for Change - Co-production and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Children With a Social Worker

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GlasgowRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsParent-Child Relations, Child Mental Disorder, Child MaltreatmentArmsInfant Parent Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jaycee PownallSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. jaycee.pownall@glasgow.ac.uk.
Karen CrawfordSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lindsay DalgarnoSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Judith FisherSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Sharon GrahamSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fiona TurnerSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Helen MinnisSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Kathleen BoydSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Abril SeyahianSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alex McConnachieSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Nicola CosgraveSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Julia Donaldson, NSPCC, Glasgow, UK.
Matt FordeNSPCC, London, UK.
Carol AtkinsonEast London Family Court, London, UK.
Janet McCulloughGlasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership, Children'S Services, Glasgow, UK.
Kapil SayalUnit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
Dennis OugrinYouth Resilience Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Mary University of London, London, Queen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many families where children have a social worker, parents have experienced challenges in their own childhoods or have neurodevelopmental conditions. These families often endure significant stress, which is frequently worsened by financial or housing challenges. This added pressure can strain relationships and increase the risk of child maltreatment, as well as contribute to mental health issues in children. Relationship-focused interventions show promise in preventing child maltreatment, although there are currently no interventions that simultaneously address neurodevelopmental conditions and the impact of poverty. We have co-produced, alongside parent experts-by-experience, local stakeholders, and infant mental health practitioners, a new service called Infant Parent Support (IPS). IPS will i) adopt a relationship-focused approach to comprehensive understanding of family functioning, ii) incorporate child and parent mental health and neurodevelopmental awareness, and iii) ensure a poverty aware approach throughout. The aim of this phase is to investigate the feasibility of a definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of IPS compared with services-as-usual (SAU).

methodsThe study settings are social care services in two local authorities: Glasgow City Council (Scotland) and the London Borough of Bromley (England). Our target population is children on a 'child in need' plan (or the Scottish equivalent) and eligible participants are families where i) the infant(s) are aged 0-5 years and ii) the family has an allocated social worker plus a multi-agency support plan. Thirty participants will be identified by social workers and randomised to receive either IPS or SAU. Families randomised to IPS will receive an intensive multidisciplinary attachment-focused assessment that provides a foundation for relationship-focused interventions. IPS will incorporate child and parent mental health and neurodevelopmental awareness and ensure a poverty aware approach throughout. Families randomised to SAU will receive the assessment and support that social care services normally implement. We will utilise a pre-post and 3/6-month follow-up design with embedded mixed-method process evaluation and exploratory economic analysis. The primary objective is to assess if enough families can be recruited, randomised, and retained in the trial such that a full-scale RCT is likely to be feasible. The secondary objectives are to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the planned outcome measures and the IPS intervention to families and professionals.

conclusionsA service like IPS, that uses a relationship-focused approach to child and parent mental health, neurodevelopmental and money/housing problems, has never previously been tested. Therefore, there are several areas of uncertainty that need to be addressed before moving onto a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A AND 2B}: Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06003582. Co-production and Feasibility RCT of Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Children with a Social Worker. Registered 22/08/2023. https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT06003582 .

Indexed as

Children in needCo-productionFeasibility randomised controlled trial (fRCT)Health economicsInfant mental healthLived experienceResilienceSocial careVulnerable families

Identifiers

PMID40474316
PMCPMC12139322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.