Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474297›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Monro-Kellie 4.0: moving from intracranial pressure to intracranial dynamics.

Sérgio Brasil, Gustavo C Patriota, Daniel Agustín Godoy, Jorge L Paranhos, Andrés Mariano Rubiano, Wellingson S Paiva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Mind the drain: expanding TIMING-ICP discussion.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sérgio BrasilExperimental Surgery Laboratory, Division of Neurological Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. sbrasil@alumni.usp.br.
Gustavo C PatriotaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Emergência e Trauma Senador Humberto Lucena, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Daniel Agustín GodoyNeurointensive Care, Sanatório Pasteur, Catamarca, Argentina.
Jorge L ParanhosIntensive Care and Neuroemergency, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, São João del Rei, Brazil.
Andrés Mariano RubianoNeurosciences and Neurosurgery, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Wellingson S PaivaExperimental Surgery Laboratory, Division of Neurological Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Monro-Kellie doctrine, introduced in the late 18th century, was a groundbreaking concept aimed at explaining the interactions between intracranial volume components. It has since become a cornerstone of brain physiology, now recognized as intracranial dynamics. Initially, the doctrine focused on physiological observations of the three incompressible components of the cranial vault: brain tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Over the centuries, advancements in neuroscience and medical technology have deepened our understanding of intracranial pressure (ICP) regulation, its pathophysiological implications and its role in neurological disorders. This revisitation of the Monro-Kellie doctrine examines how impairments in cerebrovascular autoregulation, brain compartmentalization and the glymphatic system interact in severely brain-injured patients, calling for new management strategies when facing these critical situations. Additionally, it reinforces the need for a holistic monitoring approach to improve early diagnostics and intervention. The evolution of ICP assessment has significantly shaped the management of brain trauma, spontaneous bleeding, ischemic stroke, and hydrocephalus. With the introduction of innovative tools such as brain ultrasound, automated pupillometry and noninvasive pressure waveform monitoring, ICP management is shifting toward more accessible and continuous evaluation strategies. This review explores how blending historical principles with cutting-edge innovations is transforming neuromonitoring and enhancing patient outcomes in critical care.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureCerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisHumansAcute brain injuryIntracranial compartmental syndromeIntracranial complianceIntracranial pressureTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40474297
PMCPMC12142851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.