ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Reflection on clinical and methodological issues in rare disease clinical trials.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Neutral Comparison of Multivariate Hypothesis Tests for Parallel Group Designs in Rare Disease Settings.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Macrophage Extracellular Vesicles: Therapeutic Strategies for Corneal Fibrosis in Rare Diseases.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare diseases present critical challenges to healthcare systems, patients, and caregivers due to their low prevalence and unique characteristics. Designing clinical trials and developing statistical methodologies for evaluating interventions in rare diseases face several challenges. The "EBStatMax" project, part of the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases' Demonstration Projects, aimed to address one of these challenges, namely: designing and analyzing longitudinal cross-over data in rare diseases, like Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS). Although the main findings of the project have been published elsewhere, this manuscript reflects on additional hurdles encountered during the project, particularly regarding outcomes and methodological considerations. It explores issues surrounding outcome measurement, statistical methodology, and clinical considerations, emphasizing their broader relevance to methodological advancements in rare disease research beyond this specific case. This manuscript highlights the critical role of international collaboration in rare disease research to enhance evidence quality and aims to inspire further advancements in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.