SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025
Volatile sedation in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volatile anesthetic sedation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Volatile sedation as a source of greenhouse gas emissions in intensive care medicine.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Lung protective characteristics of volatile anesthetic sedation.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Critical Care Sedation: Emerging Clinical Considerations and Risks of Volatile Anesthetics for Sedation: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Magnesium Sulfate as an Analgesic and Sedative-sparing Agent in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Article
- Volatile sedation in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation: not all sedatives are equivalent, in sustainability!Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Is volatile sedation truly associated with increased mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults compared to intravenous sedation? Moving beyond pairwise meta-analysis to individual agent assessment via bayesian network meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Volatile sedation in critically ills adults undergoing mechanical ventilation: not all inhaled sedatives are equivalent!Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolatile sedation has been associated with lung-protective effects, attenuation of inflammatory responses, and reduced organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. However, whether these potential benefits may translate into improvements in clinically relevant outcomes remains unclear. The primary aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to test the hypothesis that volatile sedation, compared to intravenous sedation, would reduce mortality in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation.
methodsThis study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023458064). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until March 18, 2025, for RCTs comparing volatile sedatives with intravenous sedatives in critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up. The secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hypotension, acute kidney injury, delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting, atrial fibrillation, and time from sedative discontinuation to extubation. A random-effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis was used for data synthesis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the robustness of the pooled data for the primary outcome.
resultsWe included 21 RCTs, comprising 2367 patients. Compared to intravenous sedation, volatile sedation may increase mortality at the longest follow-up (262/1107 vs. 218/1106; relative risk: 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.35; low certainty). However, TSA suggested a lack of definitive conclusion, as the required sample size was 12,080. No meaningful effects were observed on secondary outcomes, except for slightly shortened time from sedation termination to extubation (mean difference, - 90.62 min; 95% confidence interval, - 124.64 to - 56.60; low certainty),
conclusionsThis meta-analysis of RCTs showed that, compared to intravenous sedation, volatile sedation may increase mortality among mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Based on the current randomized evidence, its use in the ICU should be limited to carefully selected clinical scenarios. Further research is needed to identify patient populations that may benefit from this sedation strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.