Observational studyBMC oral health2025
Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for bilateral posterior condylar displacement using cone-beam computed tomography and machine-learning algorithms: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CBCT-MRI-based prediction models for stratifying anterior disc displacement in orthodontic patients: development and independent internal validation of a retrospective diagnostic study.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Integrating Clinical Innovation and Workflow Optimization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Support in Dentistry Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are frequently associated with posterior condylar displacement; however, early prediction of this displacement remains a significant challenge. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate a predictive model for bilateral posterior condylar displacement.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, 166 cone-beam computed tomography images were examined and categorized into two groups based on condyle positions as observed in the sagittal images of the joint space: those with bilateral posterior condylar displacement and those without. Three machine-learning algorithms-Random Forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were used to identify risk factors and establish a risk assessment model. Calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analyses were employed to evaluate the accuracy of the predictions, differentiation, and clinical usefulness of the models, respectively.
resultsArticular eminence inclination (AEI) and age were identified as significant risk factors for bilateral posterior condylar displacement. The area under the curve values for the LASSO and Random Forest models were both > 0.7, indicating satisfactory discriminative ability of the nomogram. No significant differences were observed in the differentiation and calibration performance of the three models. Clinical utility analysis revealed that the LASSO regression model, which incorporated age, AEI, A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angle, and facial height ratio (S-Go/N-Me), demonstrated superior net benefit compared to the other models when the probability threshold exceeded 45%.
conclusionPatients with a steeper AEI, insufficient posterior vertical distance (S-Go/N-Me), an ANB angle ≥ 4.7°, and older age are more likely to experience bilateral posterior condylar displacement. The prognostic nomogram developed and validated in this study may assist clinicians in assessing the risk of bilateral posterior condylar displacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.