Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474167›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2025

Understanding turnover in healthcare and welfare sectors of high-income countries: an umbrella review.

Herlinde Wynendaele, Els Clays, Ellen Peeters, Yannai DeJonghe, Ann Van Hecke, Jeroen Trybou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Herlinde WynendaeleDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. herlinde.wynendaele@ugent.be.
Els ClaysDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ellen PeetersTIAS School for Business and Society, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yannai DeJongheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ann Van HeckeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen TrybouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis umbrella review aims to systematically synthesize the current evidence on the factors associated with personnel turnover in the healthcare and welfare sectors, the methodologies used to measure turnover, and the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce turnover.

methodsFollowing PRISMA-P guidelines, we analyzed data from January 2013 to July 2023 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for predefined eligibility criteria. They also collaboratively examined 10% of the full texts to ensure compliance with these criteria. Study quality was evaluated using AMSTAR 2, and a Corrected Covered Area analysis was conducted.

resultsThe analysis included 37 studies with a total of 511 primary studies. Turnover factors were grouped into three categories: socio-demographics and health status, work environment characteristics, and personal attitude and functioning, highlighting a wide range of factors that influence both turnover intention and actual turnover. Various measurement methodologies were identified, with a notable lack of standardization. Interventions targeting work-related factors showed mixed effectiveness, underscoring the importance of context-specific strategies.

conclusionsThe findings show the complexity and context-specific nature of turnover in healthcare and welfare sectors, requiring targeted, context-specific interventions to address the diverse factors involved. Standardization of measurement methodologies is necessary for comparing turnover rates and the effectiveness of interventions. Future research should focus on filling existing gaps, particularly in non-hospital settings, and on developing and evaluating multifaceted interventions.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesHealth Care SectorPersonnel TurnoverSocial WelfareHumansActual turnoverFactorsHealthcare workforceSystematic umbrella reviewTurnover intentionWelfare sector

Identifiers

PMID40474167
PMCPMC12139298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.