ReviewBMC medical education2025
How best to train kids in basic life support: a literature review.
Review in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBystander intervention is known to be the most important factor in the survival chain for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rates remain low-mainly due to a lack of training. Implementing basic life support (BLS) training in schools is a key aspect of increasing bystander intervention. We reviewed the literature on BLS training methods for schoolchildren and sought to identify the methodological elements that appeared to be the most effective in terms of the acquisition and retention of knowledge, practical skills, and attitudinal skills.
methodsWe searched the MEDLINE database (via PubMed) for relevant articles published between from January 2015 to January 2022. Articles on BLS training in children were selected if the primary objective was determine the effectiveness of the training method(s) used.
resultsOf the 1,098 publications identified, 28 were selected and reviewed. Half of the studies had a randomized, controlled design, the study sample size ranged from 57 to 1,917. Hands-on practice was included in 26 of the 28 studies, and the main training session lasted for 75 to 120 min. Hands-on practice gave better results than no practice. Learning tools promoted acquisition, and refresher training sessions appeared to be of value.
conclusionsThe results of our literature review showed that the conventional training pattern used with adults (i.e. theory, demonstration, and practice) is applicable to children if all the components are adapted for this population. Further studies of the development and evaluation of BLS training for young children are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.