Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474146›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Re-drawing the map: a case study of decolonized research methods & methodologies.

Maya Stevens-Uninsky, Najuwa Gallant, Tashreeq Chatting, Deborah D DiLiberto, Russell de Souza, Lawrence Mbuagbaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maya Stevens-UninskyDepartment of Global Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Stevem28@mcmaster.ca.
Najuwa GallantFreedom Park, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tashreeq ChattingFreedom Park, Cape Town, South Africa.
Deborah D DiLibertoDepartment of Global Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Russell de SouzaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecolonized research methodologies aim to challenge existing power structures and amplify community voices, yet there is little guidance on their practical application. This study documents the methodological process, adaptations, and outcomes of applying decolonized research methods in a qualitative exploratory study on adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Freedom Park, South Africa.

methodsThis study is a methods documentation of lessons learned in an exploratory study. We applied a decolonized methodology, which incorporated elements of PAR, Indigenous, and co-design research approaches, engaging a Community Advisory Committee to collaboratively design research and data collection methods.

resultsWe used the research processes of this study to demonstrate how decolonized methodologies can be applied and integrated into research. The Community Advisory Committee's involvement resulted in a unique adaptation of body mapping that was culturally relevant, and prioritized anonymity, community context, and participant comfort. The research process emphasized reciprocity, non-hierarchical collaboration, and collective knowledge production, challenging traditional Western research paradigms. Participants were highly engaged, and the adapted method facilitated open discussions on sexual and reproductive health topics that might otherwise be stigmatized.

conclusionsThis study illustrates how decolonized methodologies can be effectively implemented through community co-design, centering local knowledge while addressing power imbalances in research. The findings highlight the importance of self-determination in research design and the potential for adapted participatory methods to enhance data validity and community impact. Future research should continue to explore and document practical applications of decolonized methodologies to inform ethical and contextually appropriate research practices.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthResearch DesignSexual HealthAdolescentCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaBody mappingCo-DesignDecolonized methodologyJusticeMethod designReciprocal researchSexual health

Identifiers

PMID40474146
PMCPMC12142978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.